Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) provides a rigorous framework for decision-making tasks in which data acquisition is often the critical bottleneck, especially in resource-constrained settings. Traditionally, BOED typically selects designs by maximizing expected information gain (EIG), commonly defined through the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence. However, classical evaluation of EIG often involves challenging nested expectations, and even advanced variational methods leave the underlying log-density-ratio objective unchanged. As a result, support mismatch, tail underestimation, and rare-event sensitivity remain intrinsic concerns for KL-based BOED. To address these fundamental bottlenecks, we introduce an IPM-based BOED framework that replaces density-based divergences with integral probability metrics (IPMs), including the Wasserstein distance, Maximum Mean Discrepancy, and Energy Distance, resulting in a highly flexible plug-and-play BOED framework. We establish theoretical guarantees showing that IPM-based utilities provide stronger geometry-aware stability under surrogate-model error and prior misspecification than classical EIG-based utilities. We also validate the proposed framework empirically, demonstrating that IPM-based designs yield highly concentrated credible sets. Furthermore, by extending the same sample-based BOED template in a plug-and-play manner to geometry-aware discrepancies beyond the IPM class, illustrated by a neural optimal transport estimator, we achieve accurate optimal designs in high-dimensional settings where conventional nested Monte Carlo estimators and advanced variational methods fail.

Bayesian experimental design (BED) for complex physical systems is often limited by the nested inference required to estimate the expected information gain (EIG) or its gradients. Each outer sample induces a different posterior, creating a large and heterogeneous set of inference targets. Existing methods have to sacrifice either accuracy or efficiency: they either perform per-outer-sample posterior inference, which yields higher fidelity but at prohibitive computational cost, or amortize the inner inference across all outer samples for computational reuse, at the risk of degraded accuracy under posterior heterogeneity. To improve accuracy and maintain cost at the amortized level, we propose a grouped geometric pooled posterior framework that partitions outer samples into groups and constructs a pooled proposal for each group. While such grouping strategy would normally require generating separate proposal samples for different groups, our tailored ensemble Kalman inversion (EKI) formulation generates these samples without extra forward-model evaluation cost. We also introduce a conservative diagnostic to assess importance-sampling quality to guide grouping. This grouping strategy improves within-group proposal-target alignment, yielding more accurate and stable estimators while keeping the cost comparable to amortized approaches. We evaluate the performance of our method on both Gaussian-linear and high-dimensional network-based model discrepancy calibration problems.

Sequential experimental design under expensive, gradient-free objectives is a central challenge in computational statistics: evaluation budgets are tightly constrained and information must be extracted efficiently from each observation. We propose \textbf{ALMAB-DC}, a GP-based sequential design framework combining active learning, multi-armed bandits (MAB), and distributed asynchronous computing for expensive black-box experimentation. A Gaussian process surrogate with uncertainty-aware acquisition identifies informative query points; a UCB or Thompson-sampling bandit controller allocates evaluations across parallel workers; and an asynchronous scheduler handles heterogeneous runtimes. We present cumulative regret bounds for the bandit components and characterize parallel scalability via Amdahl's Law. We validate ALMAB-DC on five benchmarks. On the two statistical experimental-design tasks, ALMAB-DC achieves lower simple regret than Equal Spacing, Random, and D-optimal designs in dose--response optimization, and in adaptive spatial field estimation matches the Greedy Max-Variance benchmark while outperforming Latin Hypercube Sampling; at $K=4$ the distributed setting reaches target performance in one-quarter of sequential wall-clock rounds. On three ML/engineering tasks (CIFAR-10 HPO, CFD drag minimization, MuJoCo RL), ALMAB-DC achieves 93.4\% CIFAR-10 accuracy (outperforming BOHB by 1.7\,pp and Optuna by 1.1\,pp), reduces airfoil drag to $C_D = 0.059$ (36.9\% below Grid Search), and improves RL return by 50\% over Grid Search. All advantages over non-ALMAB baselines are statistically significant under Bonferroni-corrected Mann--Whitney $U$ tests. Distributed execution achieves $7.5\times$ speedup at $K = 16$ agents, consistent with Amdahl's Law.

Model-based design of experiments (MBDOE) is essential for efficient parameter estimation in nonlinear dynamical systems. However, conventional adaptive MBDOE requires costly posterior inference and design optimization between each experimental step, precluding real-time applications. We address this by combining Deep Adaptive Design (DAD), which amortizes sequential design into a neural network policy trained offline, with differentiable mechanistic models. For dynamical systems with known governing equations but uncertain parameters, we extend sequential contrastive training objectives to handle nuisance parameters and propose a transformer-based policy architecture that respects the temporal structure of dynamical systems. We demonstrate the approach on four systems of increasing complexity: a fed-batch bioreactor with Monod kinetics, a Haldane bioreactor with uncertain substrate inhibition, a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with nuisance clearance parameters, and a DC motor for real-time deployment.

Model-based approaches for (bio)process systems often suffer from incomplete knowledge of the underlying physical, chemical, or biological laws. Universal differential equations, which embed neural networks within differential equations, have emerged as powerful tools to learn this missing physics from experimental data. However, neural networks are inherently opaque, motivating their post-processing via symbolic regression to obtain interpretable mathematical expressions. Genetic algorithm-based symbolic regression is a popular approach for this post-processing step, but provides only point estimates and cannot quantify the confidence we should place in a discovered equation. We address this limitation by applying Bayesian symbolic regression, which uses Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo to sample from the posterior distribution over symbolic expression trees. This approach naturally quantifies uncertainty in the recovered model structure. We demonstrate the methodology on a Lotka-Volterra predator-prey system and then show how a well-designed experiment leads to lower uncertainty in a fed-batch bioreactor case study.

Our design policy successfully achieves amortized intervention design on the distribution of the training environment while also generalizing well to distribution shifts in test-time design environments.

Suppose an online platform wants to compare a treatment and control policy, e.g.,

For example, in personalized medical diagnostics, a model is built based on historical data to facilitate an optimal treatment for a new patient (Bica et al., 2021).

A/B testing is critical for modern technological companies to evaluate the effectiveness of newly developed products against standard baselines. This paper studies optimal designs that aim to maximize the amount of information obtained from online experiments to estimate treatment effects accurately.